Employment Contracts, How to Prove Discrimination

Navigating the Benefits of an Executive Compensation Package

October 30, 2025

A group of executives review the policy and benefits in their compensation package.
author bio pic of Wills  Ladd

Written by Wills Ladd

Brought to you by Filippatos Employment Law, Litigation & ADR

If you’re stepping into a C-suite role, your employment offer isn’t just about the salary—it’s a complex legal and financial framework that’s going to shape your wealth, career flexibility, and long-term security. Negotiating executive compensation packages is a high-stakes process where every single clause is a chance to gain leverage. Don’t mistake that initial offer for the final deal—it’s just the opening move in a crucial conversation about what you’re worth and what your future at the company will look like.

Working with an experienced New York contract lawyer ensures your agreement isn’t just generous, but also protective. This guide breaks down the essential parts of an executive package, walks you through the legal minefield of restrictive covenants, exposes how discrimination can hide in compensation structures, and lays out the negotiation strategies you need to lock in a contract that actually reflects your value—and protects your fundamental rights.

Deconstructing the C-Suite Offer: A Component-by-Component Analysis

Understanding the distinct elements of an executive offer is the first step toward mastering its negotiation. Each component serves a different purpose and has unique points of leverage.

Base Salary: The Foundational Benchmark

The base salary is the fixed, foundational component of your compensation, providing financial security and predictability. Crucially, it serves as the benchmark for other variable elements of your pay, as annual bonuses and other incentives are often calculated as a percentage of this base figure. While seemingly straightforward, negotiating a higher base salary has a multiplier effect, elevating the potential value of your entire package and signaling the market’s valuation of your role and expertise.

Short-Term Incentives (STIs) & Annual Bonuses, or STIs, are typically cash-based annual benefits designed to reward the achievement of specific, pre-agreed goals within a single fiscal year. These objectives often include measurable metrics like revenue growth or improved profit margins, but are increasingly tied to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) targets. The structure frequently involves a three-tier system: a threshold for minimum payout, a target for expected performance, and a stretch goal for extraordinary results.

The critical negotiation point here is the definition of “performance.” While financial metrics are often clear, ESG and DEI goals can be subjective depending on the preconceived notions of the company head. This ambiguity creates risk, as a board could use vaguely defined targets as a pretext to deny a bonus, potentially masking underlying discrimination. An executive’s counsel must insist on crystal-clear, objective, and quantifiable metrics to prevent future disputes.

Long-Term Incentive Plans: By far the largest potential component of executive pay, LTIPs are designed to align your interests with long-term shareholder value. These plans, which typically vest over three to five years, can include stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs), performance shares, or Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs).

This is the most complex and lucrative area of negotiation. Discussions should focus on the vesting schedule, including provisions for accelerated vesting in the event of a change-in-control. The structure of these incentives can also subtly influence corporate strategy. For example, stock options vesting over a short period may encourage actions that boost the stock price temporarily rather than fostering sustainable growth. By negotiating for LTIPs tied to a broader set of metrics over a longer horizon (5-7 years), you can signal a commitment to the firm’s long-term health, positioning yourself as a strategic leader and justifying a larger overall package.

Benefits and Perquisites: The Hidden Value Drivers

Beyond standard health and retirement plans, executives often receive enhanced benefits like Supplemental Employee Retirement Plans, or SERPS, and nonqualified deferred compensation plans, which are critical for overcoming the savings limitations of standard 401(k)s. Perquisites such as financial planning services, executive physicals, and use of company transportation, also add significant value. Though smaller in dollar amount than LTIPs, these elements substantially impact an executive’s financial health and quality of life.

Contingent Payments

This category includes severance packages and change-in-control provisions (“golden parachutes”), designed to provide financial security in the event of termination or a company merger. A “double trigger” clause is a best practice, requiring both a change-in-control and a subsequent loss of employment (or a significant reduction in duties) for a payout to occur. Negotiating these exit terms while the relationship is positive is paramount. Key points include the definition of “good reason” for a voluntary departure, the amount of severance, and the continuation of health benefits.

Navigating Restrictive Covenants in New York

The clauses that restrict your future employment are among the most contentious and critical to negotiate. The legal landscape in New York is complex and continuously evolving.

The Enforceability of Non-Compete Agreements

New York courts generally are against non-compete agreements. To be enforceable, an employer must prove the agreement is necessary to protect a legitimate business interest (like trade secrets), is reasonable in time and geographic scope, does not harm the public, and is not unduly burdensome on the employee. Restrictions lasting longer than one year are often invalidated, and a termination without cause can render the entire clause unenforceable.

Courts are increasingly side-eyeing non-compete agreements—and that gives you serious bargaining power. Plus, the writing’s on the wall: Governor Hochul vetoed a sweeping ban but made it clear she’s open to tighter limits, and the FTC is pushing for a nationwide prohibition. The legal landscape is shifting in employees’ favor, and you can use that uncertainty to your advantage. Push for a higher salary or ask your employer to pay you out during any non-compete period as compensation for the restrictions you’re accepting. Even smarter? Negotiate a “legislative trigger” clause—basically, a provision that automatically updates your agreement to follow whatever the most employee-friendly non-compete laws come into effect down the road. It’s a proactive move that protects your future flexibility.

Non-Solicitation and Confidentiality Agreements

Because non-compete agreements are tough to enforce, employers often pivot to more aggressive tactics: non-solicitation agreements and non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).

Non-Solicitation Agreements: These clauses stop you from reaching out to former clients or colleagues, and New York courts tend to view them more favorably since they’re less restrictive than full non-competes. When negotiating, get specific. Push to narrow the definition of “client” to only those you personally worked with—not every single customer in the company’s database. The law around employee non-solicitation is still pretty unsettled, which gives you solid ground to argue for removing it entirely.

NDAs: Make no mistake: an executive’s duty to protect an employer’s trade secrets is highly enforceable. You’re not getting out of that core obligation—it’s non-negotiable. But what is negotiable? The definition of “confidentiality.” Make sure the definition is not so sweeping that it includes general industry knowledge you’d naturally pick up in your career. Otherwise, you’re basically dealing with a backdoor non-compete, and that’s not fair game.

When Disputes Arise

The back end of your contract dictates how conflicts will be resolved. These clauses involve the waiver of fundamental rights and require careful legal scrutiny.

The Rise of Mandatory Arbitration

Many employment contracts include mandatory arbitration clauses, forcing you to resolve disputes in a private forum instead of a public court and waive your right to a jury trial. While generally legal in New York, this process has significant drawbacks for employees. The privacy of arbitration shields companies from public accountability, and arbitrators may favor “repeat player” employers who provide them with consistent business.

Data shows that employees are less likely to win in arbitration, and their awards are significantly smaller than those granted in court.

The federal “Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act” now voids mandatory arbitration for those specific claims. This law signals a broader public policy shift that a skilled attorney can leverage to negotiate “carve-outs” for other statutory claims, such as those related to race, age, or gender discrimination, preserving your right to a day in court for fundamental rights violations.

The Intersection of Compensation and Discrimination

Even in seemingly generous offers, discrimination can hide in plain sight—not in the dollar amount, but in how the package is structured. New York State and federal laws ban discrimination across all aspects of employment, including pay. While blatant bias is less common at the executive level, discrimination often appears in the architecture of the compensation package itself. For example, a female executive might receive an offer with less at-risk equity pay and a higher fixed salary, which sounds safer but actually caps her long-term earning potential compared to male colleagues in similar roles. During negotiation, a workers’ rights attorney can review your offer against industry benchmarks to spot these disparities and build a case for restructuring the package to match the equity-heavy offers your peers receive.

Conclusion

The executive employment offer is a high-stakes document designed to protect the company’s interests. To ensure it also protects yours, you need an equally sophisticated advocate in your corner. Negotiating your contract is a complex interplay of finance, strategy, and law that requires deep expertise.

Call a New York Employment Law Attorney Now

The team at Filippatos PLLC acts as both compassionate counselors and fierce advocates, leveling the playing field in your favor. As your dedicated New York contract lawyers, we work tirelessly to secure an agreement that is not just lucrative but fundamentally fair. If you are experiencing discrimination at work, please give us a call at 888-9-JOBLAW for a free consultation. We will do our utmost to help secure you the justice you deserve.